Poster
in
Workshop: Next Generation of AI Safety
Rule Based Rewards for fine-grained LLM Safety
Tong Mu · Alec Helyar · Johannes Heidecke · Joshua Achiam · Andrea Vallone · Ian Kivlichan · Molly Lin · Alex Beutel · John Schulman · Lilian Weng
Keywords: [ Safety ] [ RLHF ] [ LLM ] [ RLAIF ] [ RBR ] [ refusal ] [ Large Language Model ] [ alignment ]
Reinforcement learning based fine-tuning of large language models (LLMs) on human preferences has been shown to enhance both their capabilities and safety behavior. However, in cases related to safety, without precise instructions to human annotators, the data collected may cause the model to become overly cautious, or to respond in an undesirable style, such as being judgmental. Additionally, as model capabilities and usage patterns evolve, there may be a need to add or relabel data to modify safety behavior. We propose a novel preference modeling approach that requires minimal human data and utilizes AI feedback. Our method, Rule Based Rewards (RBR), uses a collection of rules for desired or undesired behaviors (e.g. "refusals should not be judgmental") along with a LLM grader. In contrast to prior methods using AI feedback, our method uses fine-grained, composable, LLM-graded few-shot prompts as reward directly in RL training, resulting in greater control, accuracy and ease of updating. We show that RBRs are an effective training method, resulting in safety performance comparable to human-feedback baseline while reducing over-refusals.