Known learning rules tend to fall near one of two extremes: single-pass associative learning with low complexity and capacity, and multi-pass iterative learning with high complexity and capacity. In this work we investigate the mathematical feasibility of learning rules that are both single-pass and achieve the theoretical upper bound on capacity. We consider a fairly broad family of learning rules we call ``span rules,'' which include known rules such as Hebbian learning, perceptron learning, and backpropagation as special cases. To our knowledge, previous work has not determined whether single-pass, full-capacity span rules exist, even in the most fundamental case of a linear threshold neuron with binary input vectors, which is the focus of this study. We derive a necessary condition for the existence of such learning rules, which takes the form of a linear program, and show that the linear program is infeasible. This establishes a hardness result that span rules can not be both single-pass and full-capacity. Future work on single-pass, full-capacity learning can use this hardness result as a design constraint.