In this paper, we develop a structured critique of robotic simulations for real-world manipulation, by arguing that scaling simulators are neither necessary nor sufficient for making progress in general-purpose real-world robotic manipulation agents that are compliant with human preferences. With the ubiquity of robotic simulators, and recent efforts to scale them for diverse tasks, and at the same time the interest in generally capable real-world manipulation systems, we believe it is important to address the limitations of using simulation for real-world manipulation, so that as a community, we can focus our collective resources, energy, and time on approaches that have more principled odds of success. We further demonstrate the unique challenges that real-world manipulation presents, and show through examples and arguments why scaling simulation doesn't get us closer to solving these challenges required for diverse real-world deployment.