We propose a distributional framework for offline Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) that jointly models uncertainty over reward functions and full distributions of returns. Unlike conventional IRL approaches that recover a deterministic reward estimate or match only expected returns, our method captures richer structure in expert behavior, particularly in learning the reward distribution, by minimizing first-order stochastic dominance (FSD) violations and thus integrating distortion risk measures (DRMs) into policy learning, enabling the recovery of both reward distributions and distribution-aware policies. This formulation is well-suited for behavior analysis and risk-aware imitation learning. Theoretical analysis show that the algorithm converge with $\mathcal{O}(\varepsilon^{-2})$ iteration complexity. Empirical results on synthetic benchmarks, real-world neurobehavioral data, and MuJoCo control tasks demonstrate that our method recovers expressive reward representations and achieves state-of-the-art imitation performance.

How does the amount of compute available to a reinforcement learning (RL) policy affect its learning? Can policies using a fixed amount of parameters, still benefit from additional compute? The standard RL framework does not provide a language to answer these questions formally. Empirically, deep RL policies are often parameterized as neural networks with static architectures, conflating the amount of compute and the number of parameters. In this paper, we formalize compute bounded policies and prove that policies which use more compute can solve problems and generalize to longer-horizon tasks that are outside the scope of policies with less compute. Building on prior work in algorithmic learning and model-free planning, we propose a minimal architecture that can use a variable amount of compute. Our experiments complement our theory. On a set 31 different tasks spanning online and offline RL, we show that $(1)$ this architecture achieves stronger performance simply by using more compute, and $(2)$ stronger generalization on longer-horizon test tasks compared to standard feedforward networks or deep residual network using upto 5 times more parameters.

Planning with a generative model aims to estimate the value of a state using as few simulator calls as possible. SmoothCruiser achieves problem-independent complexity $\widetilde O(\varepsilon^{-4})$ by exploiting the smoothness of the entropy-regularized Bellman backup, but its estimator is only first-order. We show that the sample-complexity exponent of SmoothCruiser-type planners is governed by the order $\beta$ of the local Taylor remainder, giving oracle complexity $\widetilde O(\varepsilon^{-(2+2/(\beta-1))})$: the first-order case $\beta=2$ recovers SmoothCruiser, while a second-order/cubic remainder $\beta=3$ yields $\widetilde O(\varepsilon^{-3})$. We reach this regime with an optimal-transport-smoothed Bellman backup over action distributions, which has a closed form, a policy gradient, and a Lipschitz Hessian, and whose quadratic correction admits an unbiased cross-product estimator. The resulting SecondOrderSmoothCruiser achieves $\widetilde O(\varepsilon^{-3})$ oracle complexity for fixed OT parameters, and we relate the OT, entropy-regularized, and unregularized objectives through explicit regularization-bias bounds.

Policies learned via continuous actor-critic methods often exhibit erratic, high-frequency oscillations, making them unsuitable for physical deployment. Current approaches attempt to enforce smoothness by directly regularizing the policy's output. We argue that this approach treats the symptom rather than the cause. In this work, we theoretically establish that policy non-smoothness is fundamentally governed by the differential geometry of the critic. By applying implicit differentiation to the actor-critic objective, we prove that the sensitivity of the optimal policy is bounded by the ratio of the Q-function's mixed-partial derivative (noise sensitivity) to its action-space curvature (signal distinctness). To empirically validate this theoretical insight, we introduce PAVE (Policy-Aware Value-field Equalization), a critic-centric regularization framework that treats the critic as a scalar field and stabilizes its induced action-gradient field. PAVE rectifies the learning signal by minimizing the Q-gradient volatility while preserving local curvature. Experimental results demonstrate that PAVE achieves smoothness comparable to policy-side smoothness regularization methods, while maintaining competitive task performance, without modifying the actor.