Poster

InteractComp: Evaluating Search Agents With Ambiguous Queries

Mingyi Deng ⋅ Lijun Huang ⋅ Yani Fan ⋅ Fanqi Kong ⋅ Jiayi Zhang ⋅ Fashen Ren ⋅ Jinyi Bai ⋅ Fuzhen Yang ⋅ Dayi Miao ⋅ Zhaoyang Yu ⋅ Yifan Wu ⋅ Yanfei Zhang ⋅ Fengwei Teng ⋅ Yingjia Wan ⋅ Song Hu ⋅ Yude Li ⋅ Xin Jin ⋅ Conghao Hu ⋅ Haoyu Li ⋅ Qirui Fu ⋅ Tai Zhong ⋅ Xinyu Wang ⋅ Robert Tang ⋅ Nan Tang ⋅ Wu ⋅ Yuyu Luo

Abstract

Language agents have demonstrated remarkable potential in web search and information retrieval. However, these search agents assume user queries are complete and unambiguous, an assumption that diverges from reality where users begin with incomplete queries requiring clarification through interaction. Yet most agents lack interactive mechanisms during the search process, and existing benchmarks cannot assess this capability. To address this gap, we introduce INTERACTCOMP, a benchmark designed to evaluate whether search agents can recognize query ambiguity and actively interact to resolve it during search. Following the principle of easy to verify, interact to disambiguate, we construct 210 expert-curated questions across 9 domains through a target-distractor methodology that creates genuine ambiguity resolvable only through interaction. Evaluation of 17 models reveals striking failure: the best model achieves only 13.73% accuracy despite 71.50% with complete context, exposing systematic overconfidence rather than reasoning deficits. Forced interaction produces dramatic gains, demonstrating latent capability current strategies fail to engage. Longitudinal analysis shows interaction capabilities stagnated over 15 months while search performance improved seven-fold, revealing a critical blind spot. This stagnation, coupled with the immediate feedback inherent to search tasks, makes INTERACTCOMP a valuable resource for both evaluating and training interaction capabilities in search agents.