Fine-grained Analysis of Brain-LLM Alignment through Input Attribution

Understanding the alignment between large language models (LLMs) and human brain activity can reveal computational principles underlying language processing. This work describes a pipeline to apply attribution methods to the brain-LLM alignment setting to identify the specific words most important for this alignment. As a case study, we leverage it to study a contentious research question about brain-LLM alignment: the relationship between brain alignment (BA) and next-word prediction (NWP). Across two naturalistic fMRI datasets, we find that BA and NWP rely on largely distinct word subsets: NWP exhibits recency and primacy biases with a focus on syntax, while BA prioritizes semantic and discourse-level information with a more targeted recency effect. This work advances our understanding of how LLMs relate to human language processing and highlights differences in feature reliance between BA and NWP. Beyond this study, our attribution method can be broadly applied to explore the cognitive relevance of model predictions in diverse language processing tasks.