VLM-RobustBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Robustness of Vision-Language Models

Vision-language models (VLMs) achieve strong performance on standard, high-quality datasets, but we still don't fully understand how they perform under real-world image distortions. We present VLM-RobustBench, a benchmark spanning 49 augmentation types across noise, blur, weather, digital, and geometric perturbations, evaluated under graded severities (low/mid/high) and binary transforms, yielding 133 corrupted settings. We evaluate VLMs from four families (Qwen, InternVL, Molmo, Gemma) on two complementary benchmarks: MMBench (visually grounded) and MMMU-Pro (reasoning-oriented). Our results reveal that visual severity is a weak predictor of difficulty: low-severity spatial perturbations often degrade performance more than visually severe photometric corruptions. In particular, low-severity glass_blur reduces MMBench accuracy by about 8pp on average across models, while the largest drops arise from resampling and geometric distortions (e.g., upsample, elastic_transform, reaching up to 34pp. Overall, our findings suggest current VLMs are semantically strong but spatially fragile, motivating the definition of novel robustness evaluation protocols and training regimes that emphasize resampling and geometric invariances.