Verifiable Multimodal Reasoning: Fact-level Attribution with Multimodal Sources

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are increasingly used for real-world tasks involving multi-step reasoning and long-form generation, where reliability requires grounding model outputs in heterogeneous input sources and verifying individual factual claims. However, existing multimodal grounding benchmarks and evaluation methods focus on simplified, observation-based scenarios or limited modalities and fail to assess attributions in complex multimodal reasoning. We introduce MURGAT (Multimodal Reasoning with Grounded Attribution), a benchmark for evaluating fact-level multimodal attribution in settings that require reasoning beyond direct observation. Given inputs spanning video, audio, and other modalities, MURGAT requires models to generate answers with explicit reasoning and precise citations, where each citation specifies both modality and temporal segment. To enable reliable assessment, we introduce an automatic evaluation framework that strongly correlates with human judgments (r = 0.84). Benchmarking against human and automated scores reveals that even strong MLLMs frequently hallucinate citations despite correct reasoning. Moreover, we see a key trade-off: increasing reasoning depth or enforcing structured grounding often degrades accuracy, highlighting a significant gap between internal reasoning and verifiable attribution