Solving Stochastic Variational Inequalities without the Bounded Variance Assumption
Abstract
Lay Summary
Many machine learning systems are trained by repeatedly using noisy information to decide how to update their parameters. Standard theory often assumes that this noise stays under control and that the problem has a clean structure. But important min-max problems, which appear in robust learning and adversarial training settings, can violate both assumptions: the noise can grow larger as the algorithm moves, and the problem may have a more complicated structure than the standard well-behaved cases. We study whether algorithms can still be trusted in this harder setting. Instead of requiring the strongest global structure, we use a weaker condition called the weak Minty condition, which covers monotone problems and also allows certain structured nonmonotone problems. Instead of assuming uniformly bounded noise, we allow the noise to grow with the size of the current iterate. We then analyze three algorithms and prove that they converge under these weaker assumptions. Our results give the best-known theoretical guarantees for constrained stochastic min-max and variational inequality problems under this more realistic setting. This helps close the gap between clean optimization theory and the messier problems that arise in modern machine learning.