BEAR: Dissecting Embodied Abilities in Multimodal Language Models through Skill-level Evaluation and Diagnosis
Abstract
Understanding the capability bottlenecks of embodied multimodal large language models (MLLMs) is crucial for improvement. However, existing embodied benchmarks fail to provide actionable insights because they focus on task-level evaluation rather than discovering capability bottlenecks. To address this, we introduce BEAR, where we divide embodied tasks into 14 atomic skills for skill-level evaluation. BEAR comprises 4,469 interleaved image–video–text entries across 14 skills in 6 categories, ranging from low-level perception to high-level planning. We evaluate 20 MLLMs on BEAR under a hierarchical skill-level diagnosis framework and discover that (1) perceptual capabilities are major bottlenecks behind reasoning failures, and (2) models fail due to unstable spatiotemporal modeling which remain unexposed in previous benchmarks. Furthermore, building on these insights, we propose BEAR-Agent, a multimodal conversable agent that augments MLLMs with visual and spatial tools. It substantially enhances MLLMs’ performance across skills, yielding a relative improvement of 17.5% on GPT-5 on BEAR and outperform baselines by a large margin in both simulation and real-robot experiments across models. We provide our project website at https://bear-official66.github.io/.
Lay Summary
Multimodal language models are increasingly used as agents that perceive, reason, and act in physical environments. However, existing benchmarks often report only whether a task succeeds or fails, making it difficult to understand which specific abilities caused a model to fail. This work introduces BEAR, a diagnostic benchmark that breaks embodied tasks into 14 atomic skills across perception, spatial reasoning, temporal understanding, and planning. By evaluating 20 multimodal language models, BEAR reveals that many failures in high-level reasoning are caused by lower-level perception and unstable spatiotemporal understanding. Based on these findings, we further develop BEAR-Agent, which uses external visual and spatial tools to provide additional information to the model and improve both offline evaluation and online robot execution. Our work aims to make embodied AI evaluation more diagnostic and to provide clearer guidance for building more reliable embodied agents.