An Empirical Study of Memory Poisoning Defenses for LLM Agents

Large Language Model (LLM) agents use memory to learn from past interactions. However, this reliance on memory introduces a critical security risk: an adversary can inject seemingly harmless records into an agent's memory to manipulate its future behavior. This vulnerability is characterized by two core aspects: First, the malicious effect of injected records is only activated within a specific context, making them hard to detect when individual memory entries are audited in isolation. Second, once triggered, the manipulation can initiate a self-reinforcing error cycle: the corrupted outcome is stored as precedent, which not only amplifies the initial error but also progressively lowers the threshold for similar attacks in the future. To address these challenges, we introduce \emph{A-MemGuard} (\underline{A}gent-\underline{Mem}ory \underline{Guard}), the first defense framework for LLM agent memory. The core idea of our work is the insight that memory itself must become both \emph{self-checking} and \emph{self-correcting}. Without modifying the agent's core architecture, A-MemGuard combines two mechanisms: (1) \textbf{consensus-based validation}, which detects anomalies by comparing reasoning paths derived from multiple related memories and (2) a \textbf{dual-memory structure}, where detected failures are distilled into ``lessons'' stored separately and consulted before future actions, breaking error cycles and enabling adaptation. Comprehensive evaluations on multiple benchmarks show that A-MemGuard effectively cuts attack success rates by over 95\% while incurring a minimal utility cost. This work shifts LLM memory security from static filtering to a proactive, experience-driven model where defenses strengthen over time.