Timezone: »

 
Poster
Estimating and Penalizing Induced Preference Shifts in Recommender Systems
Micah Carroll · Dylan Hadfield-Menell · Stuart Russell · Anca Dragan

Tue Jul 19 03:30 PM -- 05:30 PM (PDT) @ Hall E #1026

The content that a recommender system (RS) shows to users will influence them. Therefore, when choosing which recommender to deploy, one is implicitly also choosing to induce specific internal states in users. Even more, systems trained via long-horizon optimization will have direct incentives to manipulate users, e.g. shift their preferences so they are easier to satisfy. In this work we focus on induced preference shifts in users. We argue that -- before deployment -- system designers should: estimate the shifts a recommender would induce; evaluate whether such shifts would be undesirable; and even actively optimize to avoid problematic shifts. These steps involve two challenging ingredients: estimation requires anticipating how hypothetical policies would influence user preferences if deployed -- we do this by using historical user interaction data to train predictive user model which implicitly contains their preference dynamics; evaluation and optimization additionally require metrics to assess whether such influences are manipulative or otherwise unwanted -- we use the notion of “safe shifts”, that define a trust region within which behavior is safe. In simulated experiments, we show that our learned preference dynamics model is effective in estimating user preferences and how they would respond to new recommenders. Additionally, we show that recommenders that optimize for staying in the trust region can avoid manipulative behaviors while still generating engagement.

Author Information

Micah Carroll (UC Berkeley)
Dylan Hadfield-Menell (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
Stuart Russell (UC Berkeley)
Anca Dragan (University of California, Berkeley)

Related Events (a corresponding poster, oral, or spotlight)

More from the Same Authors