Timezone: »

 
Poster
Do We Need Zero Training Loss After Achieving Zero Training Error?
Takashi Ishida · Ikko Yamane · Tomoya Sakai · Gang Niu · Masashi Sugiyama

Thu Jul 16 05:00 PM -- 05:45 PM & Fri Jul 17 04:00 AM -- 04:45 AM (PDT) @ None #None

Overparameterized deep networks have the capacity to memorize training data with zero training error. Even after memorization, the training loss continues to approach zero, making the model overconfident and the test performance degraded. Since existing regularizers do not directly aim to avoid zero training loss, they often fail to maintain a moderate level of training loss, ending up with a too small or too large loss. We propose a direct solution called \emph{flooding} that intentionally prevents further reduction of the training loss when it reaches a reasonably small value, which we call the \emph{flooding level}. Our approach makes the loss float around the flooding level by doing mini-batched gradient descent as usual but gradient ascent if the training loss is below the flooding level. This can be implemented with one line of code, and is compatible with any stochastic optimizer and other regularizers. With flooding, the model will continue to ``random walk'' with the same non-zero training loss, and we expect it to drift into an area with a flat loss landscape that leads to better generalization. We experimentally show that flooding improves performance and as a byproduct, induces a double descent curve of the test loss.

Author Information

Takashi Ishida (The University of Tokyo / RIKEN)
Ikko Yamane (The University of Tokyo)
Tomoya Sakai (NEC)
Gang Niu (RIKEN)
Masashi Sugiyama (RIKEN / The University of Tokyo)

More from the Same Authors